Portable Bluetooth Speakers

My Android Phone Won T Turn On

Embark on a Quest with My Android Phone Won T Turn On

Step into a world where the focus is keenly set on My Android Phone Won T Turn On. Within the confines of this article, a tapestry of references to My Android Phone Won T Turn On awaits your exploration. If your pursuit involves unraveling the depths of My Android Phone Won T Turn On, you've arrived at the perfect destination.

Our narrative unfolds with a wealth of insights surrounding My Android Phone Won T Turn On. This is not just a standard article; it's a curated journey into the facets and intricacies of My Android Phone Won T Turn On. Whether you're thirsting for comprehensive knowledge or just a glimpse into the universe of My Android Phone Won T Turn On, this promises to be an enriching experience.

The spotlight is firmly on My Android Phone Won T Turn On, and as you navigate through the text on these digital pages, you'll discover an extensive array of information centered around My Android Phone Won T Turn On. This is more than mere information; it's an invitation to immerse yourself in the enthralling world of My Android Phone Won T Turn On.

So, if you're eager to satisfy your curiosity about My Android Phone Won T Turn On, your journey commences here. Let's embark together on a captivating odyssey through the myriad dimensions of My Android Phone Won T Turn On.

Showing posts sorted by date for query My Android Phone Won T Turn On. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query My Android Phone Won T Turn On. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Apple Watch Series 5 Vs. Fitbit Versa 2: Best Smartwatch To Give As A Gift


Apple watch series 5 vs fitbit versa 2 download apple watch series 5 vs fitbit versa 3 apple watch series 5 vs fitbit versa manual apple watch series 5 vs series 3 apple watch series 5 vs series se apple watch series 5 vs series 4 refurbished apple watch series 5 apple watch series 3 apple watch series 1 apple watch series 8
Apple Watch Series 5 vs. Fitbit Versa 2: Best smartwatch to give as a gift


Apple Watch Series 5 vs. Fitbit Versa 2: Best smartwatch to give as a gift

The Apple Watch Series 5 starts at $399 (£399, AU$649) and makes an ideal gift for an iPhone user who wants to keep an eye on their health and fitness goals, or get notifications from their phone. But the Fitbit Versa 2 costs half as much and has many similar features, plus it works across Android and iOS. I've been wearing both these watches for a few weeks to determine which one is better at tracking workouts, getting notifications and has the best battery life. 

Read more: Best gifts for people who are obsessed with CrossFit

Angela Lang/CNET

A versatile hybrid that's equal parts smartwatch and fitness tracker, the Versa 2 adds a few improvements over the first version that make it a good option for Apple and Android owners alike. Like the Apple Watch, it too has an always-on display, but the battery will last more than twice as long. Expect at least five days between charges if you don't have the always-on display active. It also gives you built-in sleep tracking, Alexa support and Spotify control on your wrist.

Read the Fitbit Versa 2 hands-on.

All-day comfort so you can go from the office to the gym

The Apple Watch comes in two sizes (40mm and 44mm) while the Versa 2 just comes in one size. I have a fairly small wrist and found both of these watches very comfortable to wear all day. With the Versa 2, I hardly had to take it off at all because I could use it to track my sleep.

Want a wide range of finishes and straps to choose from? You'll find the biggest selection with the Apple Watch. Everything from aluminum and stainless steel to the more expensive ceramic and titanium finishes that cost upward of $800. The Versa 2 has three aluminum color finishes with a variety of straps.

apple-watch-2-vs-fitbit-1
Angela Lang/CNET

The Versa 2 gets a much nicer color AMOLED display than the first generation Versa and it's easy to see in bright sunlight when the brightness is turned to max. (The always-on display could be a little brighter for me during outdoor workouts, however.) Notifications and on-screen prompts are clear and legible.

The Apple Watch uses a color LTPO OLED Retina display. It also has Force Touch, so you can press on the screen to register different options.

They're both water-resistant to 50 meters (164 feet) so you can use them to track swims and they'll be fine if subjected to occasional splashes. 

Fitbit still makes its straps pretty difficult to swap in and out, as they have tiny toggles, whereas the Apple Watch is simpler with a button to slide the strap in and out. The charging dock for the Versa 2 is also a pain. Not only is it not backward-compatible with older generations of Fitbit watches like the original Versa, the cord doesn't tuck underneath the dock neatly so it's next to impossible to get your watch to lie flat on the dock when it's charging.

Smart features put the Apple Watch a step ahead

If you like customizing the look of your watch face, the Versa 2 has a lot more options to choose from than the Apple Watch, including third-party watch faces. There's even a Bitmoji watch face that changes expressions depending on your activity or time of day (my personal favorite).

Both have an always-on display and, thanks to the latest Fitbit OS 4.1 update, the Versa 2 now gets the option of a color always-on display, like the Apple Watch. But the Apple Watch only makes it through one whole day with a little extra to spare when I have the always-on display active. That's with a 40-minute workout thrown in and regular use throughout the day getting notifications from my phone. The Versa 2 makes it two-and-a-half days with always-on active and the same usage. That goes up to five-and-a-half days when the display is set to raise-to-wake.

apple-watch-2-3

The always-on display on the Versa 2.

Angela Lang/CNET

Being smartwatches, both support voice assistants, though they handle that in a different way. With the Versa 2 you get Alexa support to control smart devices, check the weather, start a workout or set reminders. There's no speaker, so you'll have to read the screen to check responses. And it's kind of slow.

With the Apple Watch closely integrated with Siri, you can speak the wake word or hold the button to summon the assistant. You'll be able to hear Siri talk, send text messages, speak responses and do most of what Siri offers on your phone.

Of course, you'll also be able to customize what notifications come through from your phone on both of these watches. However, you will only be able to respond to notifications from the Versa 2 if you're on Android, not iPhone. Both allow you to accept and reject calls from your wrist, regardless of what phone you're tied to, but if you have the Versa 2 you won't be able to take the call on your wrist because there's no speaker -- you'll need to grab your phone.

For me, the biggest advantage that the Apple Watch has over the Versa 2 when it comes to smart features is built-in connectivity, both GPS and cellular, which means you can leave your phone at home and take calls, send messages or stream music on the go when doing an outdoor workout, for example. (It does come at an extra cost, however.) With Emergency SOS you'll also be able to call emergency services from your wrist and share your location, plus alert your emergency contacts. The Apple Watch Series 5 also offers a built-in compass.

Both offer music storage, although it's more complicated to pull across music to the Versa 2 from a computer than it is to use the seamless transfer offered between the iPhone and Apple Watch. You can also pay with your wrist thanks to Fitbit Pay and Apple Pay on the Versa 2 and Apple Watch respectively.

I've been testing the Apple Watch and Versa 2 primarily with an iPhone and definitely feel the Apple Watch was the faster of the two when it comes to syncing and transferring settings. Occasionally, I have noticed integrations with third-party apps such as Spotify and Snapchat for the Bitmoji face require me to log in and sync again through the Fitbit app.

Read about some of the other features offered in WatchOS 6 on the Apple Watch.

Fitness tracking is Fitbit's forte, but Apple has ECG

I have used both of these watches during a number of different workouts (Pilates, indoor spin class, outdoor runs and outdoor bike rides) and have been impressed with the results from both. During my outdoor run, for example, both gave fairly consistent results when it came to tracking my heart rate, although I did find the Apple Watch updated my heart rate slightly faster. I haven't yet tested these watches against the gold standard in consumer heart rate tracking, a chest strap.

The Versa 2, however, can show you what heart rate zone you're in during a workout, such as cardio or fat burn, which I appreciate. Only the Apple Watch offers you on-wrist cadence tracking so you can see your steps per minute, plus pace alerts for running that can notify you if you fall below your chosen pace. You can see your pace on the wrist for the Versa 2, but you won't get alerts.

Both watches can track plenty of different workouts and automatically detect certain activities like running or walking. I find it easier to see and interpret the data from my workouts using the Fitbit app rather than trying to search for it across the Activity app or Health app on iPhone.

Fitbit also offers the Coach app (you'll need to download and sync it across to the watch from the Fitbit app) which puts three free workouts with visual guidance on your wrist. This hasn't changed since the first Versa but it's still a nice touch for those who might not have time for a full workout. You can pay for a Fitbit Premium subscription ($9.99 a month in the US) to get more workouts.

104-fitbit-versa-2

Sleep tracking on the Versa 2.

Sarah Tew/CNET

Sleep tracking is only available natively on the Versa 2 and I really like how Fitbit shows you a breakdown of your different sleep stages, such as REM and deep sleep, plus gives you a sleep score out of 100. Thanks to the latest OS 4.1 update, you can now see your sleep score on the Versa 2 and the watch now has a feature that vibrates to wake you at the optimal time in your sleep cycle (within 30 minutes of your alarm). Fitbit calls this smart wake.

Unfortunately the app won't tell you much about how to improve the sleep score (apart from some standard prompts to go to bed on time) unless you have a Fitbit Premium subscription which has more advanced sleep tools and analysis.

I also found that there was sometimes a variance between how I felt and the sleep score: For example, one night I got 8.5 hours of rest and felt great in the morning, but my sleep score was in the low 60s. The sleep score does take into account your restoration, which is sleeping heart rate and how much you toss and turn during the night. (Maybe I'm an overly active sleeper, because my restoration score showed a lot of restlessness.)

The Apple Watch helps you keep tabs on your daily activity using a ring-based system, which hasn't changed since the first generation. On the Versa 2 you can find your daily metrics in the Today section by swiping down from the main screen.

As for health and heart tracking in particular, the Apple Watch Series 5 pulls ahead. With a built-in ECG (electrocardiogram) that's FDA-cleared, the watch can also detect high, low and irregular heart rates and notify you accordingly. It also has fall detection. Both watches offer menstrual cycle tracking, although you can't log details on the Versa 2 like you can on the Apple Watch. Instead, you'll need to do that in the Fitbit app.

Which one's right for me?

Considering the Versa 2 costs half as much as the Apple Watch Series 5, if money is your concern, then this is the watch for you. Especially because it works across Android and iOS. It also has a wide range of activities that it can track and the Fitbit app makes it really easy to see your fitness metrics.

For runners, or those who want to leave their phone at home and stream music on the go, make calls or send messages, the Apple Watch with built-in LTE is the clear choice. It also has the benefit of ECG in certain countries.

Also, now that Apple has reduced the entry price of the Apple Watch Series 3 (which also has GPS and an LTE option) to $200, it's another good option for Apple users who want the tightest integration with an iPhone.

Originally published earlier this year.


Source

https://nichols.my.id/how-to-fix-restart-to-repair-drive-errors-on-windows-10.html

.

Motorola Moto G6 Review: A Budget Phone Shouldn't Be This Good


Motorola moto g60 review motorola moto g8 review motorola moto g6 play review cnet com motorola moto g5 review motorola moto g7 review motorola moto g60 review motorola moto g62 5g motorola moto g60 cena motorola moto g62 5g 4/64gb motorola moto g power 2022 motorola moto g7
Motorola Moto G6 review: A budget phone shouldn't be this good


Motorola Moto G6 review: A budget phone shouldn't be this good

How do you follow up last year's wonderful budget-friendly Moto G5 Plus? Well, you could start with the outside. Add a second rear camera for portrait mode photos. Trade that Micro-USB port for a USB-C. Get rid of the 16:9 screen ratio and go tall with a trendy 18:9 display that shows more vertically. Say bye to the metallic back side and hello to a glass back with curved edges, specifically Gorilla Glass 3.

The overall result would be a phone that looks decidedly 2018, but with pretty much everything we loved about last year's Moto G5 Plus. And that's exactly what the Moto G6 is.

Last year's Moto G5 Plus hit a sweet spot between features, design, performance and price. The Moto G6 hits most of those, but just misses with a shorter battery life than last year's Motos.

The Moto G6 looks sleek and modern. It has a groomed slicked-back hair vibe that makes it seem anything but affordable. But at $249, £219 or AU$399 it's crazy affordable compared to the $1,000 iPhone X.

Roughly the same size as the Moto G5 Plus, the Moto G6 has thinner bezels and a glass back that curves at the edge for a comfortable grip. Like nearly every phone with a glass back, it collects more fingerprints than the stars of CSI.

But the Moto G6 isn't the only affordable Motorola phone to consider. If you're outside the US and your budget has some wiggle room, the Moto G6 Plus deserves a serious look. If you're okay with last year's styling, check out the Moto G5S Plus which is still being sold.

On the left is the Moto G6 and on the right the Moto G6 Play. The dual-camera unit on the Moto G6 looks like a shocked face emoji.

Sarah Tew/CNET

Moto G6, G6 Plus, G6 Play: What's the difference?

I tested the Moto G6 with 32GB of storage, 3GB of RAM and no NFC. I bring this up because there are three new G-series phones for 2018. To confound things further, each model is tweaked a bit depending on where you live.

  • Moto G6 Play: This is the most affordable of the three phones. In the US, it costs $50 less than the Moto G6. The Moto G6 Play has a lower resolution display and only a single rear camera, but it also has the biggest battery of the three -- a 4,000-mAh whopper more capacious than the one found in the Galaxy S9. Read CNET's full Moto G6 Play review.
  • Moto G6: Though it's roughly the same size as the Moto G6 Play, the Moto G6 has a higher resolution display, dual rear cameras and a more powerful processor. In the UK and Australia, the Moto G6 comes with NFC, and there's a "step up" UK version with 4GB of RAM and 64GB of storage.
  • Moto G6 Plus: Despite not being available in the US, the Moto G6 Plus is the highest-end option in the Moto G family. It has a 5.9-inch display instead of the 5.7-inch ones found on the G6 and G6 Play. Its battery is slightly larger than the one in the G6. The UK model has NFC and an optional 6GB of RAM.

Moto G6, G6 Plus, G6 Play top features and prices

Key features of the Moto G phone family


Moto G6 (US, UK, Australia) Moto G6 (UK) Moto G6 Plus (UK, Australia) Moto G6 Play (US, UK, Australia)
Price (without discounts) $249, £219, AU$399 £239 £269, AU$499 $199, £169, AU$329
Screen 5.7-inch 5.7-inch 5.9-inch 5.7-inch
Processor 1.8 GHz octa-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 1.8 GHz octa-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 2.2GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 1.4GHz octa-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 427
Storage 32GB 64GB 64GB 16GB (US only), 32GB
RAM 3GB 4GB 4GB, 6GB (UK only) 2GB (US only), 3GB
Battery 3,000 mAh 3,000 mAh 3,200 mAh 4,000 mAh
Rear camera(s) 12-megapixel & 5-megapixel 12-megapixel & 5-megapixel 12-megapixel & 5-megapixel 13-megapixel
NFC Yes (UK, Australia), No (US) Yes Yes Yes (UK), No (Australia)

Here's a photo of a cable car taken with the Moto G6. The photo has good dynamic range keeping the sky in-balance with the cable car.

Patrick Holland/CNET

Moto G6 has dual-rear cameras and portrait mode

The dual-rear cameras take solid photos, but your shots aren't going to be on the same level as pictures shot on the Pixel 2, iPhone X or even the OnePlus 6. You'll get the best results when taking photos under bright even light. The Moto G6 has an "active photos" mode which, like Apple's live photos and Google's motion photos, records a tiny amount of video before and after you take a picture.

It's impressive that a phone that costs $249 has a portrait mode.

Patrick Holland/CNET

Motorola added a bunch of fun modes to the camera one of which is portrait mode. The Moto G6 takes serviceable portrait mode shots. Despite the background being blurred out, portrait mode photos don't "pop" as much as they could. I like that the Moto G6 lets me change the focus point and the amount of background blur after I take a portrait mode photo. These little adjustments, like on the Galaxy S9 and S9 Plus, can turn a less-than-perfect portrait into something pretty good.

The top is a selfie taken with the Moto G6. The bottom is a "group selfie" that is kind of a mix of a selfie and panorama. In this case, it made Lexy's head double in size.

Lexy Savvides/CNET

Selfies are just OK, but there is a front-facing flash which can be handy. There's also a group selfie mode that prompts you to move the phone left and then right, like when you take a panorama photo. The phone then "stitches" the selfie panorama together. The results are hit-or-miss. For example, it "glitched" and doubled the back of my friend's making her look like an alien wearing two pairs of sunglasses on her head -- see the photo above.

The Moto G6 uses artificial intelligence (AI) to identify objects, landmarks and text and optimize things accordingly. It can record video at 1080p. But there's no 4K and no slow-motion mode. And that's fine because I'm not buying this phone to be the next Steven Spielberg. I'm buying it because it's cheap.

Here's a video I recorded with the Moto G6:

Moto G6 battery life, speed and everything else

The G6 runs Android 8.0 Oreo and has Google Assistant and the Google Lens augmented reality tool. Both of them worked well: I enjoyed pointing the Moto G6's camera at buildings and tapping the Google Lens icon to get more information about the things around me. It was like I was on my own private architecture tour.

But any phone that costs a couple hundred dollars is going to have sacrifices and the Moto G6 is no different. In speed tests, the Moto G6 was slower than the Moto G5 Plus, but not by much. In real world use, it handled everyday tasks such as messaging, Instagram, watching YouTube videos and playing games well. I was even able to play PUBG Mobile with the frame rate set at medium -- it's ridiculous that I did this on a phone that costs $250.

Geekbench v.4.0 single-core

Moto G6 740 Moto G5 Plus 830
Note: Longer bars indicate better performance

Geekbench v.4.0 multicore

Moto G6 3,940 Moto G5 Plus 4,138
Note: Longer bars indicate better performance

3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited

Moto G6 818 Moto G5 Plus 861
Note: Longer bars indicate better performance

3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited

Moto G6 12,792 Moto G5 Plus 13,382
Note: Longer bars indicate better performance

The Moto G6's battery fared worse than the Moto G5 and G5 Plus. During our looped video battery tests (in airplane mode), the Moto G6 lasted an average of 9 hours, 41 minutes compared to the Moto G5, which lasted 13 hours, and the Moto G5 Plus, which lasted 13 hours, 22 minutes. Though in real-world use, the Moto G6 had no problem getting through the day on a single charge even after heavy use.

Despite having a glass back, the Moto G6 doesn't have wireless charging. But to be fair, only a few super premium phones support wireless charging. It's not unusual for a budget phone to omit it.

The Moto G6 can be charged fast via its "Turbopower" charger which seems more useful than wireless charging to me. The Moto G6 has a "splash proof" coating but isn't IP rated for water resistance -- so don't drop it in a toilet. But if you do, rest assured that buying a replacement Moto G6 won't break your bank.

Spec comparison of the Moto G6, G6 Plus, G6 Play, G5 and G5 Plus


Motorola Moto G6 Motorola Moto G6 Plus Motorola Moto G6 Play Motorola Moto G5 Motorola Moto G5 Plus
Display size, resolution 5.7-inch; 2,160x1,080 pixels 5.9-inch; 2,160x1,080 pixels 5.7-inch; 1,440x720 pixels 5-inch; 1,920x1,080 pixels 5.2-inch; 1,920x1,080 pixels
Pixel density 424ppi 409ppi 282ppi 440ppi 424ppi
Dimensions (Inches) 6.1x2.8x0.3 in 6.3x3x0.3 in 5.1x2.8x0.4 in 5.7x2.9x0.37 in 5.9x2.9x0.3 in
Dimensions (Millimeters) 153.8x72.3x8.3 mm 160x75.5x8 mm 154.4x72.2x9 mm 144.3x73x9.5 mm 150.2x74x7.7 mm
Weight (Ounces, Grams) 5.9 oz; 167g 5.9 oz, 167g 6.2 oz; 175g 5.1 oz, 145g 5.5 oz, 155g
Mobile software Android 8.0 Oreo Android 8.0 Oreo Android 8.0 Oreo Android 7.0 Nougat Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera 12-megapixel and 5-megapixel 12-megapixel and 5-megapixel 13-megapixel 13-megapixel 12-megapixel
Front-facing camera 8-megapixel 8-megapixel 8-megapixel 5-megapixel 5-megapixel
Video capture 1080p 4K 1080p 1080p 4K
Processor 1.8 GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 2.2GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 1.4GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 1.4GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 2GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 625
Storage 32GB/64GB 64GB 16GB/32GB 16GB, 32GB 32GB, 64GB
RAM 3GB, 4GB 4GB, 6GB 2GB, 3GB 2GB,3GB 2GB, 3GB, 4GB
Expandable storage 128GB 128GB 128GB 128GB 128GB
Battery 3,000mAh 3,200mAh 4,000mAh 2,800mAh (removable) 3,000mAh
Fingerprint sensor Below screen Below screen Back Below screen Below screen
Connector USB-C USB-C Micro-USB Micro-USB Micro-USB
Headphone jack Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Special features Dual-SIM, Splash-proof, time lapse video, Turbo Charger Dual-SIM, Splash-proof, time lapse video, Turbo Charger Splash-proof, 10-watt fast charger Dual-SIM, splash-proof Dual-SIM, splash-proof
Price off-contract (USD) $249 NA $199 NA $229 (32GB); $299 (64GB)
Price (GBP) £219 (32GB); £239 (64GB) £269 £169 £169, £179 £249
Price (AUD) AU$399 AU$499 AU$329 AU$299 AU$399

Source

https://notabler.pops.my.id/

.

Huawei Mate 8 Review: An Overpriced Battery Life Beast


Huawei Mate 8 review: An overpriced battery life beast


Huawei Mate 8 review: An overpriced battery life beast

Huawei's all-metal, 6-inch Mate 8 has a lot going for it, especially its long-lasting battery and high camera quality. After all, those are two things almost anyone would look for in a phone. But unfortunately the handset's price tag is too steep to close the deal -- €600 for the 32GB version and €700 for the 64GB model. Those numbers translate to roughly $650 and $760; £450 and £525.

The Mate 8 isn't expected to come to the US.

The prices alone aren't the problem; they're in line with premium rivals. The problem is that the Mate 8 just isn't a premium phone, certainly not premium enough to best the Google Nexus 6P or Samsung Galaxy Note 5, two of the phones I would look at if you're thinking of going large (scroll to the end for a full specs comparison). Part of my recommendation to skip the Mate 8 stems from the other, admittedly minor drawbacks, including a screen resolution that's lower than I'd like on a phone of this size.

A much lower price would help blunt those flaws and give fans of big phones a good alternative in an all-metal build. However, if you can get the Nexus 6P or Galaxy Note 5, or even the LG V10, do that instead. You'll get more for your hard-earned cash.

Pros:

  • Long-lasting battery
  • Recent version of Google's software, Android 6.0
  • All-metal build
  • Same accurate fingerprint reader that's on the back of the Huawei-made Google Nexus 6P
  • Loud speaker audio

Cons:

  • Large size is polarizing and won't fit comfortably in all hands
  • Dim screen
  • Screen resolution is too low

Battery life and screen size set the Mate 8 apart, but...

If you're hot on big phones, the Mate 8's 6-inch screen gives you the room you need to run wild. When I hold the Mate 8 in my hand, the screen seems bright and wonderful...until I stream video, view high-res photos or hold it next to any other phone. It's then that I notice its 1,920x1,080-pixel resolution looks dimmer and a little hazier than other phones of its class at any brightness level, especially the impossibly vibrant Nexus 6P.

Compared to ultrasharp displays like on the Nexus 6P's 2,560x1,440-pixel resolution, higher-res graphics look less detailed; that's because there are fewer pixels on the Mate 8, much lower than you typically see on a large-screen phone (see chart below). Most of the time, the Mate 8's resolution won't impede your viewing pleasure, but Huawei really should have climbed to the next rung in resolution to match the well-priced Nexus 6P (2,560x1,440 pixels).

The battery lurking below this shiny exterior packs some real muscle.

Sarah Tew/CNET

Better news is that battery here is a monster -- the Mate 8 lasted an average of 15.6 hours in our video drain tests. In everyday life, too, I always seemed to have enough battery reserves after continuously using it throughout the day. Some of that is due to the dimmer screen, though if your battery ever does get perilously close to flatlining, you can always turn on the phone's power-saving settings.

Bonus points: Camera and Android 6.0

Photos were another bright spot. The 16-megapixel rear camera and 5-megapixel front-facing camera shot off rounds of very nice photos in most lighting settings, indoor and out. I'm not saying these were flawless -- camera photos do have their limits and I did get some weirdly yellow indoor shots in seriously terrible lighting -- but the camera components have gotten so good lately that most higher-end models will take photos you like.

Selfie shots were also pretty good when tested in the hand and yes, even on a selfie stick during a rowdy New Year's party, but Huawei does shove Beauty Mode down your throat -- unbelievably, you have your choice of two. Those with a more natural vibe can switch to the usual camera mode to slides settings down from Beauty 10 to zero.

The camera took pleasing photos in almost every lighting condition I threw its way.

Josh Miller/CNET

Here's another good thing: the Mate 8 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow onboard, Google's latest software. Being up to date means you get new features like Doze (automatic battery-saving software) and Now on Tap (which pops up extra info when you press the home button) -- I also like invoking Google voice search ("OK, Google") from any screen. The presence of Android 6.0 hopefully means that Huawei will continue to update the Mate 8 as Google rolls out updates.

If you've never used a Huawei phone before, you should know that Huawei liberally sauces Android with its own flavor, which it calls the Emotion UI (EMUI 4.0). It's a pretty dramatic change if you're used to the Nexus 6P's vanilla Android. Your apps lay out along multiple home screens like on the iPhone, and the lock screen and notifications pull-down menu have different effects, too. Spend some time playing around with the settings menu and lock screen and you'll get it all how you want it. I personally like some of the animated transitions, but a lot of Android purists I know rail against any changes to their favorite Android skin.

The colors on this broad-leaf plant are vibrant without being oversaturated.

CNET

I photographed this venerable St. Bernard close to the stroke of midnight on New Year's Eve.

Jessica Dolcourt/CNET

These friends took the Huawei Mate 8's selfie capabilities into their own hands -- er, their own selfie stick.

CNET

Our standard studio shot, taken in controlled lighting with the Mate 8.

James Martin/CNET

Things I'm not sold on

I've already mentioned that screen resolution is lower than I expect for a premium-priced handset. The Mate 8's processor and overall dimensions also raise some red flags.

The processor

Huawei doesn't just make gadgets, it now makes processors, too. Like Samsung, Huawei started using its Kirin chipset in phones. The Mate 8 did fine in our diagnostic tests, but generally lagged behind top phones from Samsung and Apple. More worrisome, Riptide GP2, which I regularly use to test smartphones, crashed the six or seven times I tried to push the limits in graphics settings (it played on medium-level graphics, though). On the other hand, those crashes could have more to do with how the developers coded the app; the phone behaved fine. Everyday tasks like opening apps and uploading photos worked smoothly and seamlessly, and bootup time was on par.

Huawei Mate 8 performance

Huawei Mate 8 (32GB) 17,883 1,736 6,214 Google Nexus 6P 24,224 1,286 4,313 Apple iPhone 6S Plus 28,080 2,403 4,240 Samsung Galaxy Note 5 24,589 1,488 4,939
  • 3DMark Score (Ice Storm Unlimited)
  • Geekbench 3 Score (Single-Core)
  • Geekbench 3 Score (Multi-Core)
Note: Longer bars indicate better performance

The size

For me, the Mate 8's dimensions are just too big. The handset is hefty and wide, and even though there's a setting for one-handed controls, I'd never use them. The fingerprint sensor on the back that you can use to unlock the phone is dead on when you position your finger correctly, but I had to stretch to reach the sensor on the Mate 8 just as I did on the Nexus 6P, so I couldn't always unlock the phone the first time around. The larger-pawed folks I handed didn't have my problems.

Interestingly, the Mate 8 and Nexus 6P have about the same body dimensions, even though the 6P's screen is slightly smaller. If the 6P isn't too large for your hand, the Mate 8 won't be either.

Versus the Nexus 6P and others

With that premium-phone pricing and under-premium specs, the Mate 8 just isn't worth your money. Pick the Nexus 6P or Galaxy Note 5 instead. Although both are equally large in the hand, you'll enjoy a sharper, brighter screen and top-notch camera. Nexus 6P owners also get to brag about the perks of owning Android 6.0's debut phone, like getting new updates first and little things like a camera quick-start trigger.

Huawei Mate 8 specs versus rivals

Huawei Mate 8 Google Nexus 6P Apple iPhone 6S Plus Samsung Galaxy Note 5
Display size, resolution 6-inch; 1,920 x 1,080 pixels 5.7-inch; 2,560x1,440 pixels 5.5-inch; 1,920 x 1,080 pixels 5.7-inch; 2,560x1,440 pixels
Pixel density 368ppi 515ppi 401ppi 518ppi
Dimensions (Inches) 6.2 x 3.2 x 0.31 in 6.3 x 3.1 x 0.28 in 6.2 x 3.1 x 0.29 in 6 x 3 x 0.3 in
Dimensions (Millimeters) 157 x 81 x 7.9 mm 159 x 78 x 7.3 mm 158 x 78 x 7.3 mm 153 x 76 x 7.6 mm
Weight (Ounces, Grams) 6.5 oz; 185 g 6.3 oz; 178 g 6.8 oz; 192 g 6 oz; 171 g
Mobile software Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 6.0 Marshmallow Apple iOS 9 Android 5.1 Lollipop
Camera 16-megapixel 12.3-megapixel 12-megapixel 16-megapixel
Front-facing camera 8-megapixel 8-megapixel 5-megapixel 5-megapixel
Video capture 1080p HD 4K 4K 4K
Processor 2.3 GHz eight-core Huawei Kirin 950 2.0 GHz eight-core Qualcomm Snapgradon 810 Apple A9 chip (64-bit) Samsung eight-core Exynos 7 Octa 7420
Storage 32GB, 64GB 32GB, 64GB, 128GB 16GB, 64GB, 128GB 32GB, 64GB
RAM 3GB, 4GB 3GB 2GB 4GB
Expandable storage Up to 128GB None None None
Battery 4,000mAh (nonremovable) 3,450mAh (nonremovable) 2,750mAh (nonremovable) 3,000mAh (nonremovable)
Fingerprint sensor Back cover Back cover Home button Home button
Special features Dual-SIM Pure Android N/A S Pen stylus
Price off-contract (USD) ~$650 (32GB); $760 (64GB) $500 (32GB); $550 (64GB); $650 (128GB) $750 (16GB); $850 (64GB); $950 (128GB) $670-$740 (32GB); $770-$840 (64GB)
Price (GBP) ~£450 (32GB); £525 (64GB) £450 (32GB); £500 (64GB); £580 (128GB) £620 (16GB); £700 (64GB); £790 (128GB) Not sold
Price (AUD) AU$899 (32GB only) AU$900 (32GB); AU$1,000 (64GB); AU$1,100 (128GB) AU$1,230 (16GB); AU$1,380 (64GB); AU$1,530 (128GB) AU$1,100 (32GB)

Source

Tags:

Best Outdoor Projector For 2022


Best Outdoor Projector for 2022


Best Outdoor Projector for 2022

Enjoying a movie with your family is great. Enjoying it outside, relaxing under the stars, is even better. As projectors have gotten smaller, brighter, and cheaper, it's become easier than ever to set up a backyard movie night. You can choose between easily portable, battery-powered models, or wired models with built-in streaming and tons of brightness. 

Ideally, you'll have some sort of screen, but even a big sheet or posterboard can do the trick. All the projectors on this list have speakers, but if you have a big yard, or want the movie to be heard over the ruckus of some younglings, it'd be best to connect to a Bluetooth speaker. If your Wi-Fi isn't strong enough to reach where you want to show the movie, you can turn your phone into a hotspot. In a few cases you can download some content to the projector itself, but don't expect this from every model nor with every streaming service. 

Here are the best outdoor projectors we've tested.

Geoffrey Morrison/CNET

The small Mars II Pro isn't the brightest, nor smallest, nor cheapest projector on this list. It's not even the easiest to use. But it does combine a pleasing image with decent sound for a good price. It's an all-around great option without the serious drawbacks of many other portable projectors. 

The main issue with the Mars II Pro is it doesn't use the full version of the Android TV streaming service like some newer models. As such, it's not as easy to use and you won't get every streaming service. The big ones are here, of course, like Netflix and Disney Plus, but no HBO. You can connect a streaming stick, of course, and there's a USB connection to power it right on the back. 

The battery lasts about the length of a long movie. 

Check out our in-depth review of the Mars II Pro..

Geoffrey Morrison/CNET

The AAXA P6 throws out an impressive amount of light, and lasts up to a claimed 4 hours with its built-in battery. You'll need to add a streaming stick to watch anything, but there's a USB connection to power one so that's easy to do.

Overall the image quality is OK, but not great. The colors are off, the contrast ratio isn't great and its resolution of 1,280x800 pixels is noticeably softer than 1080p and especially 4K projectors. 

That said, it's bright and inexpensive, which is a great combination.

Check out our full review of the AAXA P6X.

Geoff Morrison/CNET

The Vimgo P10 regularly hovers around $250, and often drops even cheaper. It's a strange product, doing something right and a lot of things wrong. The image it produces is watchable, and has an impressively high contrast ratio, but the colors are flat-out atrocious. The brightness and sharpness uniformity are some of the worst I've seen, which means everything that's not dead center in the image is dimmer and softer than the middle. It also has no upwards throw, so it needs to be placed at the same height as the middle of the screen, which is, like I said, strange for an inexpensive projector. 

The biggest drawback for this list is its lack of a battery. But for the added price of an extension cord it's still cheaper than most other projectors on this list.

But for the price, it's hard to beat. But if you can spend more, you'll get more.

Check out our full review of the Vimgo P10..

Geoffrey Morrison/CNET

The AAXA P8 is tiny, like the Nebula Capsule, but rectangular to that projectors cylindricalness. It's significantly brighter than the Capsule, but it lacks that projector's battery.

Like its big brother, the P6X, the P8 doesn't have the best picture quality. However, it's inexpensive and bright, two things we like a lot. For similar money the Vimgo P10's picture quality is a little better, but that projector has its own serious drawbacks. 

All ultra-budget projectors have concessions to price, but with the P8 those concessions don't include brightness and size.

Check out our full review of the AAXA P8..

Geoffrey Morrison/CNET

The Laser 4K's claim to being portable and "outdoor" boils down to a huge handle built into its design. It lacks a battery, is quite heavy, and it's really expensive. 

It is, however, exceptionally bright. One of the brightest projectors we've ever tested. It has built-in Android TV too. It's more portable, and better suited to outdoor movie nights than, say, the Epson 5050. 

The Optoma UHZ50, the BenQ HT2050A or the Epson Home Cinema 2250 are better overall, however. They're all bright, cheaper and easily carried, though they lack a stylish handle.

Check out our review of the Anker Nebula Cosmos Laser 4K.

Four kids lay in the grass under the stars watching a movie on a small screen.
Klaus Vedfelt/GettyImages

Other products we've tested

Anker Nebula Solar Portable : The Solar's sibling, the Mars II Pro, is better. The Solar's main disadvantage compared to others on this list is its relatively dim image, which means it can't project as large a picture and still look good. If you want a sleek, budget-friendly portable with 1080p and plan on keeping the image on the small side, however, this is a solid choice. Read our Anker Nebula Solar Portable Review.

LG CineBeam PH30N : The tiny LG PH30N is only slightly larger than the AAXA P8. It's not particularly bright, however, nor does it have built-in apps. The battery doesn't last as long as the AAXA P6X although it is a bit cheaper. Read our LG CineBeam PH30N review.

Samsung Freestyle : The small, stylish, cylindrical Freestyle is an interesting idea, but it's not very bright, lacks a battery, and is quite expensive. Read our Samsung Freestyle review.

The Samsung Freestyle portable projector on a yellow background.

The Samsung Freestyle is a cool looking design but too expensive for what you get.

Geoff Morrison/CNET

Xiaomi Mi Smart Projector 2 : Is another relatively expensive small projector that could be better. You may appreciate the compact size, 1080p resolution and built-in Android TV streaming, but it's relatively dim, especially for the price. It also lacks both a built-in battery and compatibility with a USB power source, so it's not truly portable. Read our Xiaomi Mi Smart Projector 2 review.

How we test outdoor projectors

We don't treat outdoor projectors any differently, testing-wise, than any other projector. Just because a projector has the convenience of being portable doesn't mean it shouldn't perform to reasonable standards. The biggest difference is checking the performance on the battery vs. plugged in. That almost always just results in a difference in light output.

Read more: How We Test Projectors

Outdoor projector FAQs

Can any projector work outside?

Yes! Well, sort of. No projector should live outside. The humidity and temperature variations will quickly ruin a projector, just like it will with a TV. But if you plan to bring it inside after every use, something we highly recommend, you can use any projector outside.

What if my Wi-Fi doesn't reach outside?

Most phones can work as a Wi-Fi hotspot, using your cellular data instead. If you're not on an unlimited data plan, this can drain your available data however. Also consider some free, or low cost, improvements to your home's wireless network. That might extend the reach enough.

Do outdoor projectors have streaming apps? Netflix, Disney, etc?

Sometimes. Most of the projectors on this list either have full, or partial, streaming interfaces like you'd find in a modern smart TV. They might not have every streaming app, however. Netflix is pretty much a given, but beyond that, it varies. 

All the projectors on this list have an HDMI input, and all except the Capsule also have a USB connection, so you can connect any streaming stick to them and get all the apps you're used to.


Source

Tags:

Phone Won't Charge? Try This Easy DIY Toothpick Trick First


Phone Won't Charge? Try This Easy DIY Toothpick Trick First


Phone Won't Charge? Try This Easy DIY Toothpick Trick First

You've plugged your iPhone or Android phone into its charger and... nothing's happened. From broken or rusted charging ports to damaged power cables, there are plenty of reasons your phone might not charge and not all of them can be easily fixed at home. A common reason for faulty charging is simply that your charging port, whether that's Lightning on the iPhone 13 or USB-C on phones like the Google Pixel 6 Pro is clogged with months' worth of pocket fluff and the cable can't quite fit in anymore. 

Thankfully, this is one of the simplest and cheapest solutions to a charging problem. Here's how to fix it. 

CNET Tech Tips logo

Why is my charging port blocked? 

There are no covers on your phone's charging port, meaning they're exposed to every bit of dust, dirt and debris they encounter. Every time you slide your phone into your pocket your phone will be susceptible to pocket fluff and if, like me, you've got pockets filled with detritus from accidentally washing your jeans with old receipts in the pockets then that's asking for trouble. And that's to say nothing of the biscuit crumbs I have in there. Do not ask me why I have biscuit crumbs in my pockets. 

Day by day, this won't be a problem but those tiny bits of dust and fluff will build up over the months or years you have your phone, compacting together each time you plug in your charging cable until it forms a solid barrier that stops your charger from going all the way in and allowing it to connect and charge. 

Inserting a cocktail stick into an iPhone's charging port

A wooden cocktail stick is a great tool for the job as the wood won't damage the internal parts. 

Andrew Hoyle/CNET

If you've had your phone for more than six months and you're gradually finding the charger becoming less and less stable (particularly if you have to wiggle it around to get it to begin charging) then it's highly likely that dirt in your port is the culprit. 

How to clean out your phone's charging port 

It's a simple task to unclog your phone's port. You'll need a cocktail stick, toothpick or other thin item that you can poke in to the port to scrape out the grime. Wood or plastic is better as it's less likely to scrape against anything inside and potentially cause harm. I've done this using a metal SIM removal tool and while it worked well, it's not the safest option for your phone. 

Insert your tool of choice into the charging port until it won't go further and gently start scraping away. With an iPhone's Lightning port you can scrape back and forth, but with USB-C you'll need to scrape around the charging connector, which sits in the middle of the port. 

A cocktail stick inside an iPhone's charging port

Get it in there.

Andrew Hoyle/CNET

Eventually you'll start to work the compacted debris loose and you'll be able to encourage the dislodged material out of the port. It's a satisfying process and you might be surprised at how much stuff actually comes out. Gently work on the sides of the port too, but be mindful not to scrape hard against any of the metal charging connectors. 

Eventually you'll have pretty much all of it out. It's difficult to check for sure if you've gotten rid of it all as it's tricky to see inside the port, even if you have a good light to hand. But once you've got a good amount of nonsense out, you can try your charging cable again. 

Close up on dirt removed from an iPhone's charging port

The satisfying removal of nonsense from your phone's charging port.

Andrew Hoyle/CNET

Hopefully it'll plug in more securely now and begin charging. If not, carry on trying to extract more dirt and then test the charger again. If that still doesn't solve the issue it's time to consider other solutions like a new cable or charger. 


Source

Tags:

Search This Blog

Menu Halaman Statis

close