Step into a world where the focus is keenly set on Amd Ryzen 5 3600. Within the confines of this article, a tapestry of references to Amd Ryzen 5 3600 awaits your exploration. If your pursuit involves unraveling the depths of Amd Ryzen 5 3600, you've arrived at the perfect destination.
Our narrative unfolds with a wealth of insights surrounding Amd Ryzen 5 3600. This is not just a standard article; it's a curated journey into the facets and intricacies of Amd Ryzen 5 3600. Whether you're thirsting for comprehensive knowledge or just a glimpse into the universe of Amd Ryzen 5 3600, this promises to be an enriching experience.
The spotlight is firmly on Amd Ryzen 5 3600, and as you navigate through the text on these digital pages, you'll discover an extensive array of information centered around Amd Ryzen 5 3600. This is more than mere information; it's an invitation to immerse yourself in the enthralling world of Amd Ryzen 5 3600.
So, if you're eager to satisfy your curiosity about Amd Ryzen 5 3600, your journey commences here. Let's embark together on a captivating odyssey through the myriad dimensions of Amd Ryzen 5 3600.
Both Intel and AMD have forthcoming boosted versions of existing boxed processors -- for desktop upgrades and new DIY builds -- to compete for your please-moar-faster-gaming bucks. Intel has the rumored Core i9-12900KS and AMD has the Ryzen 7 5800X3D it previewed at CES 2022.
AMD says its processor is "the world's fastest gaming CPU" -- you know Intel will say the same when its turn rolls around -- saying it delivers an average of roughly 15% better 1080p performance than the higher-end Ryzen 9 5900X. The big deal is that it will do so at the same $449 price as the standard 5800X when it ships on April 20, and within the same power envelope, making it a drop-in replacement.
AMD attributes the improvement to its new 3D-stacked L3 cache using its 3D V-Cache technology. This basically allows for adding cache memory upward from the die (vertically) rather than outward, which means it can keep the same footprint.
The company has been highlighting for years how the cache -- temporary data storage for more efficient memory access -- is a key component to improving performance as the number of processor cores grows. If AMD's performance claims for the chip manifest then it's a good example of what it can do. The 3D version has three times the L3 cache of the non 3D version, 96MB compared to 32MB.
Probably to compensate for either power or heat increases, AMD had to drop the clock frequencies a bit, and it's not clear if you'll be able to overclock the processor. Otherwise, the specs are identical.
AMD also announced its latest crop of $99 to $299 boxed processors, which range from a quad-core Zen 2 (Ryzen 4000 series) through an eight-core Zen 3 (Ryzen 5000 series). And if you've been yearning to drop a Zen 3-architecture CPU into a Zen 2, Ryzen 3000-era motherboard, AMD is answering your upgrade dreams. A new BIOS update for some X370, B350 and A320-based motherboards will let you do so. It's slated to become available in April.
Both Intel and AMD have forthcoming boosted versions of existing boxed processors -- for desktop upgrades and new DIY builds -- to compete for your please-moar-faster-gaming bucks. Intel has the rumored Core i9-12900KS and AMD has the Ryzen 7 5800X3D it previewed at CES 2022.
AMD says its processor is "the world's fastest gaming CPU" -- you know Intel will say the same when its turn rolls around -- saying it delivers an average of roughly 15% better 1080p performance than the higher-end Ryzen 9 5900X. The big deal is that it will do so at the same $449 price as the standard 5800X when it ships on April 20, and within the same power envelope, making it a drop-in replacement.
AMD attributes the improvement to its new 3D-stacked L3 cache using its 3D V-Cache technology. This basically allows for adding cache memory upward from the die (vertically) rather than outward, which means it can keep the same footprint.
The company has been highlighting for years how the cache -- temporary data storage for more efficient memory access -- is a key component to improving performance as the number of processor cores grows. If AMD's performance claims for the chip manifest then it's a good example of what it can do. The 3D version has three times the L3 cache of the non 3D version, 96MB compared to 32MB.
Probably to compensate for either power or heat increases, AMD had to drop the clock frequencies a bit, and it's not clear if you'll be able to overclock the processor. Otherwise, the specs are identical.
AMD also announced its latest crop of $99 to $299 boxed processors, which range from a quad-core Zen 2 (Ryzen 4000 series) through an eight-core Zen 3 (Ryzen 5000 series). And if you've been yearning to drop a Zen 3-architecture CPU into a Zen 2, Ryzen 3000-era motherboard, AMD is answering your upgrade dreams. A new BIOS update for some X370, B350 and A320-based motherboards will let you do so. It's slated to become available in April.
AMD RX 6600 XT GPU tested: Fast performer for 1080p gaming
AMD RX 6600 XT GPU tested: Fast performer for 1080p gaming
The latest step in the graphics card pas de deux between AMD and Nvidia is the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT GPU. It's also the current entry-level model in AMD's line of graphics processors for gamers specifically looking for speed or higher quality in 1080p resolution. The RX 6600 XT's nominal $379 price and performance slots seamlessly between Nvidia's $329 GeForce RTX 3060 and $399 3060 Ti -- all in the seemingly choreographed fashion we're used to from the two manufacturers.
Both AMD and Nvidia are desperately attempting to get gamers to upgrade from the four-year-old GeForce GTX 1060, which still has the biggest installed base. But this is the absolute worst time to buy a graphics card... and has been for a while. Yes, the cryptocurrency mining crackdown in China and regulatory smackdown in Europe may lessen the demand for GPUs, but we're still in the middle of a silicon supply crunch that affects many components of graphics cards and that's expected to last at least until the end of the year. So it's bound to keep availability low, shopbots busy and prices high. And if you're looking at these low-ish end cards, you're probably really price-sensitive to begin with, making it a doubly bad time -- unless you're de sperate.
The ROG Strix RX 6600 XT OC is a dual-fan card; there will also be triple fan cards from add-in board manufacturers.
Lori Grunin/CNET
Like Nvidia's 3060 models, there's no official AMD-branded version of a card using the RX 6600 XT GPU, so we tested the Asus ROG Strix RX 6600 XT OC, a $550 dual-fan overclockable model that acquits itself well for what it is. (There's also a smaller, lower-key version of the card in the Asus Dual product line line for $500.) But in our testing, the 6600 XT at best matched or marginally outpaced the RTX 3060, even conservatively overclocked, which at least partly stems from the AMD GPU's 8-lane PCIe connection rather than NVIDIA's 16-lane connection. However, without knowing what the actual-real-true prices are as opposed to the what-planet-do-you-live-on prices, it's difficult to make a call about which GPU to recommend you make a fruitless attempt to buy.
The lesser slot requirement may make it a little more flexible for fitting into older systems, but it really cuts potential performance; if it took advantage of the higher-bandwidth slot it might give the 3060 Ti some competition.
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
Memory
8GB DDR6
Memory bandwidth (GBps)
256
GPU clock (GHz, base/boost)
2.3/2.6
Memory data rate/Interface
16 Gbps/128 bit
Texture fill rate (gigatexels per second)
342.3
Compute Units and Ray Accelerators (each)
32
Stream cores
2,048
Texture mapping units
128
TGP/min PSU (watts)
160/500
Bus
PCIe 4.0 x 8
Size
2.6 slots; 9.6 x 5.3 x 2.0 in/243 x 134 x 52 mm
Connections
1 x HDMI 2.1, 3 x DisplayPort 1.4
Manufacturer price
$550
Ship date
August 11
Asus has done a fine job eking out what it can from the GPU and it certainly delivers on the 1080p high-frame-rate promise. Physically, the card's a bit chunky for what it delivers at 2.6 slots wide, but the space allocated to the passive cooling (four heatpipes forcing the heat toward a large heat spreader and heatsink) allows it to reduce reliance on the fans at high speeds. This makes it pretty quiet and I kept having to check the monitoring utility to convince myself the fans were even spinning.
In addition to monitoring, the GPU Tweak 2 utility Asus provides lets you choose from a silent mode (with a 0dB fan toggle), gaming mode (which weights performance, cooling and noise equally) and an OC mode to maximize performance via an overclock preset or manual controls over the GPU and memory clocks, voltage, fan speed and a power target. Like the other cards in the line, there's also a toggle switch to jump between two BIOSes, one optimized for performance and the other for noise.
You can use the company's Armoury Crate software to control the logo lighting scheme, but I'm not a big fan of the software; it's just too cumbersome for my taste.
The GPU has passive cooling in addition to the fans, with four heat pipes and a backplate heat spreader across most of the card and a vent on the inside end. A physical BIOS switch lets you change between two modes (performance vs. quiet) if you don't want to use Asus' Tweak UI utility.
Lori Grunin/CNET
The card supports all the latest AMD features. They include Radeon Boost (which selectively renders scene elements at a lower resolution, based on visibility, for higher frame rates), Radeon Anti-Lag (reduces latency by lightening the load on the CPU), FidelityFX Super Resolution (upscaling from lower-resolution textures to achieve faster frame rates, a la Nvidia DLSS) and Smart Access Memory (AMD's Resizable BAR implementation, in which the CPU can store game-related data in GPU RAM rather than system RAM so the GPU doesn't have to traverse the system bus to retrieve it).
AMD is less reliant on developer support than Nvidia for much of its acceleration, but it's not entirely driver-based. Smart Access Memory only works on systems equipped with a modern AMD Ryzen CPU, for example.
Unless you're looking for the cheapest RX 6000-series AMD options, I don't think the RX 6600 XT is the best choice for its price class; the RTX 3060 Ti seems like it delivers far better performance for (theoretically) not much more. And I wouldn't rule out an even lower-end model appearing later this year to satisfy your budget-constrained 1080p play -- there was an RX 5500, so it's always possible we'll see even lower end RX 6500 or RX 6500 XT models at some point for basic 1080p gaming.
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT GPU gives gaming creators a great midlevel option
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT GPU gives gaming creators a great midlevel option
You've gotta love an industry that keeps tossing out new gaming graphics processors that get snatched out of midair before you can catch them. The latest in what I hope is the last of these launches for a while is AMD's Radeon RX 6700 XT, the new entry-level graphics card in the company's RX 6000 generation. It follows the recently launched RX 6800, 6800 XT and 6900 and the GeForce RTX 3060, Nvidia's introduced entry-level card that incorporates its latest Ampere architecture. Based on its $479 price and its overall performance, the 6700 XT competes with the similarly priced RTX 3060 Ti and RTX 3070.
The card ships March 18, with AMD offering both its own cards and third-party alternatives from all the usual suspects. It will also be available in regular retail PCs; HP has already announced that it's planning to add the card as an option in its Omen 25L and 30L desktops at the end of March, along with an AMD Ryzen 9 5900X option so you can take advantage of AMD's Smart Memory Access. AMD recently expanded SMA support down to the older Ryzen 3000 series CPUs as well.
Lori Grunin/CNET
"Available" is a moving target for graphics cards these days. Pervasive shortages due to high demand by cryptocurrency miners, the efficiency of bots at snapping them up as fast as they go on sale, pandemic-related silicon shortages and other ancillary problems have made it nearly impossible for the rest of us to get our hands on any card worth buying and at a price that even remotely reflects the true worth of it. (A direct conversion of the price is laughable in this context, but $479 is approximately £340 or AU$610.)
Nvidia attempted to address the out-of-stock problem by throttling the RTX 3060's mining-related performance, but soon after Nvidia itself accidentally circumvented the performance limiter with a driver update. (The driver was subsequently pulled.) I still expect the throttle to get hacked if the shortage goes on much longer. Which we expect.
AMD, on the other hand, is taking a more traditional supply-side approach which I don't have a lot of confidence in: working with retailers to restrict sales to one per customer, making both third-party and its own cards simultaneously available at launch, keeping its own cards on sale for a longer period (it usually stops selling its own after a certain amount of time post launch) and other tactics.
Specifications
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
Memory
12GB DDR6
Memory bandwidth (GBps)
384
GPU clock (GHz, base/boost)
2.3/2.6
Memory interface
192 bit
Texture fill rate (gigatexels per second)
413
Ray Accelerators
40
Stream cores
2,560
Texture mapping units
160
Compute Units
40
TGP/min PSU (watts)
230/650
Bus
PCIe 4.0 x 16
Size
2 slots; 10.5 inches (267mm) long
Price
$479
Ship date
March 18
The RX 6700 XT is a strong 1440p performer, hovering around the RTX 3070's spot. It generally lags that card but occasionally pulls ahead. Its one weak area looks like ray tracing, where it falls behind even the RTX 3060 on 3DMark's DXR (DirectX ray tracing) test. Unsurprising, given that Nvidia's got a generation of experience under its belt.
But with the 6700 XT, AMD continues to maintain its overall performance advantage over Nvidia's competing consumer cards for professional graphics. It doesn't require an optimized driver (like Nvidia's Studio drivers) or proprietary API support (Nvidia CUDA). Toss in the 6700 XT's 12GB of memory, and it's an excellent choice at its nominal price for video editing, notably Premiere Pro (as measured by UL's Procyon video editing benchmark, at least). It is bigger and more power hungry than the RTX 3070, however.
In the absence of rational real-world prices or availability, it's hard to make any sort of blanket recommendation for any graphics card at the moment. As long as the Radeon RX 6700 XT's price doesn't get too high, whatever that means -- though it will likely remain lower than equivalent or faster cards -- it's a good choice for 1440p gamers and creatives on a budget. Especially if you're both.
Far Cry 5 (1080p)
MSI Aegis RS (6700 XT)
MSI Aegis RS (RTX 3060)
MSI Aegis RS (6800 XT)
MSI Aegis RS (RTX 3060 Ti)
MSI MEG Trident X (RTX 2070 Super)
Note:
Longer bars indicate better performance (FPS)
Far Cry 5 (4K)
MSI Aegis RS (RTX 3060)
MSI Aegis RS (RTX 3060 Ti)
Note:
Longer bars indicate better performance (fps)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider gaming test (1080p)
MSI Aegis RS (RTX 3060)
MSI Aegis RS (RTX 3060 Ti)
MSI Aegis RS (6800 XT)
MSI Aegis RS (RTX 3070)
MSI Aegis RS (6700 XT)
Origin PC Chronos (RTX 3080)
Note:
Longer bars indicate better performance (FPS)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider gaming test (1440p)
MSI Aegis RS (RTX 3060)
MSI Aegis RS (RTX 3060 Ti)
MSI Aegis RS (RTX 3070)
MSI Aegis RS (6700 XT)
Origin PC Chronos (RTX 3080)
MSI Aegis RS (6800 XT)
Note:
Longer bars indicate better performance (FPS)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider gaming test (4K)
MSI Aegis RS (RTX 3060)
MSI Aegis RS (RTX 3060 Ti)
MSI Aegis RS (RTX 3060 with DLSS)
MSI Aegis RS (RTX 3070)
Origin PC Chronos (RTX 3080)
Note:
Longer bars indicate better performance (FPS)
3DMark Time Spy
MSI Aegis RS (RTX 3060)
MSI MEG Trident X (RTX 2070 Super)
MSI Aegis RS (RTX 3060 Ti)
MSI Aegis RS (6700 XT)
MSI Aegis RS (RTX 3070)
Maingear Turbo (RTX 2080 Ti)
MSI Aegis RS (6800 XT)
Origin PC Chronos (RTX 3080)
Note:
Longer bars indicate better performance
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra
MSI Aegis RS (RTX 3060)
MSI MEG Trident X (RTX 2070 Super)
MSI Aegis RS (RTX 3060 Ti)
MSI Aegis RS (6700 XT)
Maingear Turbo (RTX 2080 Ti)
MSI Aegis RS (RTX 3070)
Origin PC Chronos (RTX 3080)
MSI Aegis RS (6800XT)
Note:
Longer bars indicate better performance
3DMark Variable Rate Shading (4K)
MSI Aegis RS (RTX 3060)
MSI Aegis RS (3060 Ti)
MSI Aegis RS (6700 XT)
MSI Aegis RS (RTX 3070)
MSI Aegis RS (6800)
MSI Aegis RS (6800 XT)
Maingear Turbo (RTX 3080)
Note:
Longer bars indicate better performance (FPS)
SpecViewPerf 13 SolidWorks (4K)
MSI Aegis RS (RTX 3060)
MS Aegis RS (3060 Ti)
MSI Trident X (RTX 2070 Super)
Maingear Turbo (late 2020)
Maingear Turbo (RTX 2080 Ti)
MSI Aegis RS (RTX 3070)
Origin PC Chronos (RTX 3080)
MS Aegis RS (6700 XT)
MSI Aegis RS (6800)
MSI Aegis RS (6800 XT)
Note:
Longer bars indicate better performance (FPS)
Configurations
Maingear Turbo (RTX 2080 Ti)
Microsoft Windows 10 Home (2004); 3.8GHz Ryzen 9 3900XT; 32GB DDR4 SDRAM 3,600; 11GB Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti; 1TB SSD + 4TB HDD
MSI Aegis RS (RTX 3060 Ti)
Microsoft Windows 10 Home (2004); 3.8GHz Intel Core i7-10700K; 16GB DDR4 SDRAM 3,000; 8GB Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti; 1TB SSD
MSI Aegis RS (RTX 3060)
Microsoft Windows 10 Home (2H20); 3.8GHz Intel Core i7-10700K; 16GB DDR4 SDRAM 3,000; 12GB EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Black Gaming; 1TB SSD
MSI Aegis RS (RTX 3070 FE)
Microsoft Windows 10 Home (1909); 3.8GHz Intel Core i7-10700K; 16GB DDR4 SDRAM 3,000; 8GB Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition; 1TB SSD
MSI Aegis RS (RX 6700 XT)
Microsoft Windows 10 Home (2H20); 3.8GHz Intel Core i7-10700K; 32GB DDR4 SDRAM 3,200; 12GB AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT; 1TB SSD
MSI Aegis RS (RX 6800 XT)
Microsoft Windows 10 Home (1909); 3.8GHz Intel Core i7-10700K; 16GB DDR4 SDRAM 3,000; 16GB AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT; 1TB SSD
MSI Aegis RS (RX 6800)
Microsoft Windows 10 Home (1909); 3.8GHz Intel Core i7-10700K; 16GB DDR4 SDRAM 3,000; 16GB AMD Radeon RX 6800; 1TB SSD
MSI Trident X (RTX 2070 Super)
Microsoft Windows 10 Home (1909); (oc) 3.8GHz Intel Core i7-10700K; 32GB DDR4 SDRAM 2,932; 8GB Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super; 1TB SSD
Origin PC Chronos (RTX 3080)
Microsoft Windows 10 Home (2004); Intel Core i9-10900K; 16GB DDR4 SDRAM 3,200; 10GB Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 (EVGA); 1TB SSD + 500GB SSD
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 gaming graphics card is a speedy compromise for $499
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 gaming graphics card is a speedy compromise for $499
Nvidia's GeForce RTX 3070 may end up suffering from middle-child syndrome, squeezed between the two ends of Nvidia's GPU spectrum: basic 1440p for a little less or basic 4K/high-frame rate 1440p for a little more. The GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition of the $499 (£469, AU$809) graphics card I tested is geared toward high-frame rate/quality 1440p gaming, and delivers similar performance to the RTX 2080 Ti for most uses (but not all), which debuted at $999. The boost over its predecessor, the more expensive RTX 2070 Super, depends upon what you need it to do.
The release of the 3070 follows the bumpy launch of the $699 RTX 3080 and its $1,500 sibling, the RTX 3090, both experiencing price gouging due to shortages. But rumors have also surfaced about a slightly cheaper RTX 3060 Ti coming soon as well as a new card slotted between the 3070 and 3080. Plus, it's likely we'll get an entry-level 30 series card early next year to feed the mid-$300 buyers. And that doesn't take into account AMD's launch of its ambitious Radeon RX 6000-series "Big Navi" gaming cards that use the same architecture as the upcoming Xbox Series X and S and PS5consoles.
Like the RTX 3080-based graphics cards, the Ampere-generation of the company's GPU architecture achieves playable frame rates in games that use RTX-specific features like ray-tracing and global illumination. Its AI-based upscaling feature, DLSS, lets you finally game at better-than-bare-minimum frame rates without visible degradation in quality. The GPU also lifts performance over predecessors in games that don't take advantage of the whizzy features by about 10% to 20% on average, which is really most games.
Unlike its higher-end siblings, the 3070 uses older GDDR6 memory and has the same memory bandwidth as the 2070 Super. It still gets some performance boosts thanks to the second-gen ray tracing and third-gen Tensor cores, such as new algorithms and instruction sets that make them a lot more efficient and a switch to an 8nm process size from 12nm. And as is typical, it has increased core counts -- it has a lower ray-tracing core count but the Ampere RT cores are doubled-up over the Turing cores, so technically the 3070 has more. But you won't see the same uplift that the 3080 and 3090 received over earlier models.
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition specs
GeForce RTX 3070
Memory
8GB GDDR6
Memory bandwidth
448GB/sec
Memory clock (GHz)
1.75
GPU clock (GHz, base/boost)
1.5/1.73
Memory data rate/Interface
14Gbps/256 bit
Texture fill rate (gigatexels per second)
317.4
RT cores
46
CUDA Cores
5,888
Texture mapping units
184
Streaming multiprocessors
68
Tensor Cores
184
Process
8nm
TGP/min PSU
220w/550w
Max thermal (degrees C)
199F/93C
GPU name
GA104
Bus
PCIe 4.0 x 16
Size
2 slots; 9.5 x 4.4 in (242 x 112 mm)
Price
Around $499
It's also significantly less power-hungry than the higher-end cards, roughly the same as before, plus it's the same size as the 2080 Ti. While the 3070 has a similar 12-pin power connector design to the 3080 -- including an adapter in the box -- it still only connects to a single 8-pin block from the power supply. All of that means it's a much simpler upgrade, especially in tight systems. The Founders Edition, at least, ran cool and quiet during my testing, in a system where I swapped it for the 2070 Super.
Lori Grunin/CNET
I have no complaints about the RTX 3070's performance, and it's definitely worth its $499 price tag. But it may not be your best choice for the money. The Ti models generally have more memory and slightly wider data paths than the non-Ti models, which is why you'll find the 11GB 2080 Ti occasionally outperforming the 8GB 3070. It makes sense to wait and see if an RTX 3060 Ti or intermediate option between the 3070 and 3080 become reality and what AMD rolls out later this week.
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan)
Origin PC Big O (PS4 Edition)
MSI Aegis RS (MS-7C75)
Corsair One Pro i200
Note:
Longer bars indicate better performance
Geekbench 5 (CUDA)
Note:
Longer bars indicate better performance
Shadow of the Tomb Raider gaming test (1080p, highest quality)
Origin PC Big O (PS4 Edition)
MSI Aegis RS (MS-7C75)
Note:
Longer bars indicate better performance (FPS)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider gaming test (4K, highest quality)
MSI Aegis RS (MS-7C75) with DLSS
Note:
Longer bars indicate better performance (FPS)
3DMark Port Royal (RTX)
Origin PC Big O (PS4 Edition)
MSI Aegis RS (MS-7C75)
Note:
Longer bars indicate better performance
Configurations
Corsair One Pro
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro (1909); 3.3GHz Intel Core i9-10940X; 64GB DDR4 SDRAM 2,667MHz; 11GB Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti; 2TB SSD
Maingear Turbo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home (2004); 3.8GHz Ryzen 9 3900XT; 32GB DDR4 SDRAM 3,600; 11GB Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti; 1TB SSD + 4TB HDD
MSI Aegis RS
Microsoft Windows 10 Home (1909); 3.8GHz Intel Core i7-10700K; 16GB DDR4 SDRAM 3,000; 8GB Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition; 1TB SSD
MSI Trident X
Microsoft Windows 10 Home (1909); (oc) 3.8GHz Intel Core i7-10700K; 32GB DDR4 SDRAM 2,932; 8GB Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super; 1TB SSD
Origin PC Big O (PS4 Edition)
Microsoft Windows 10 Home (1909); 3.8GHz AMD Ryzen 9 3900X; 16GB DDR4 SDRAM; 8GB Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super; 1.5TB SSD (2TB SSD for console)
Origin PC Chronos
Microsoft Windows 10 Home (2004); Intel Core i9-10900K; 16GB DDR4 SDRAM 3,200; 10GB Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 (EVGA); 1TB SSD + 500GB SSD
